Hmmmm...I struggled with the title for this post. I really despise the United Nations; I loathe them with a seething hatred I usually reserve for Hussein and the Green Bay Packers. I wanted to find an appropriate tag line to go along with what I'm about to pontificate on, but settled for something a bit more subtle. Plus, "Those Fucking U.N. Jagweed Ass-Hats Should Be Whipped Forth From America With Razor-Studded Lashes and Their Building Demolished and Razed to Make Room For the First Hooters/Gun Range Store in the World" wouldn't fit in the little box.
But, Sir Ghost Knight, (you may ask), why reserve such a fine vintage of vitriol for the U.N.? Aren't they just a collection of ambassadors coming together to try and improve the world?
To which your humble scribbler would reply: "Dolt! Idiot! Damnable fool! NO! Now stop braying like a smack-snorting jackass and pay attention!" Something along those lines.
I'll get to the meat of the story in a minute. Before I do, let's go over what the United Nations really is:
1. The UN is an outdated and completely impotent organization, specializing in raising a hue and cry but rarely doing anything to alleviate a situation, and frequently making it worse.
2. The UN is a front for globalists, socialists, anti-Christians, and anti-Semites who will legitimize any Third World thug or muslim nut-job that throws enough money their way. The UN is a public relations machine for assholes.
3. The UN routinely and habitually mismanages the money that is donated to them, much of it by unsuspecting American tax-payers. Very little of it goes to feed the hungry or clothe the poor or minister the sick. Very much of it goes to glut fat ambassadors, clad mistresses and whores, and minister to dents and scratches in rented Mercedes limos.
4. The UN is an ardent supporter of international gun legislation, registration, and confiscation, which is immensely irritating and hardly surprising. UN "peacekeepers" aren't worth shit, so they'd be a lot safer if they were the only ones with firearms, I suppose. They want my guns, but they'll get fuck-all from me.
5. The UN believes itself to be the final arbiters of ethics and morality in the world, at least as far as American citizens and other free peoples go. If you're a loud and bitchy enough minority, or a death cultist, or wear a Che Guevara t-shirt under your blazer, however, they'll cave to whatever knucklehead idea you bring to the table and try to scold the rest of the world into believing it.
6. In short, the UN is a collection of complete fuck-jackers who have mastered the art of getting rich while working part time at a half-assed charitable institution with hookers and booze on every speed dial. Truth be told, as a staunch capitalist I can admire their enterprise, but as they're doing it with my unwilling dime they can all get bent.
But here's what really makes me ANGRY: "UN Report Advocates Teaching Masturbation to 5-Year-Olds." Really. That's what it says. I'll let that sink in for a minute whilst I draw a picture of the UN flag and then burn it...
...that was fun. So the Grand Poobahs of Ethics and Morality think it's okay to teach masturbation to 5-year-olds. They also feel it is entirely appropriate to teach 9-year-olds about the safety of legal abortion, and to advocate and "promote the right to and access to safe abortion" for everyone over the age of 15. UNESCO (United Nations Economic, Social, and Cultural Organization), the wing of sick twits who are promoting this garbage for the UN, also recommend that this "education" be MANDATORY. As in: "You gotta do this or else."
Some other things UNESCO wants to force down your kids' throats, aside from teaching 5-8 year-olds how to masturbate:
Teaching the 5-8 crowd about gender roles, stereotypes, and gender-based violence.
Teaching 9-year-olds about the "positive and negative effects of aphrodisiacs" (WTF!), and concerns about homophobia, transphobia (???), and abuse of power (the UN holds several World Titles in this).
At 12, children will learn about the "reasons" for abortion, having already been assured of its safety.
The UN is basing this appalling idea on the insistence that children be properly educated in "a world affected by HIV and AIDS... so they can understand and make informed decisions."
The authors of this travesty, Dr. Doug Kirby and Nanette Ecker, are "two leading experts in the field of sexuality education." I bet they throw some pretty twisted parties. They based their review on "rigorous review" of sex-ed literature, and "87 studies from around the world."
Wow. That's really...hmm. Well, as an old college friend of mine was fond of saying when he was perplexed: "Fuck me runnin'!" I have several reactions:
First, the knee-jerk part of my mind would like to meet the authors and pull their gizzards out through their elbows for not only suggesting this crap but having the temerity to insist that it be made mandatory. I feel qualified to say this because I am a leading expert in the field of Creative Ways to Disembowel People. But that gets awfully messy and I'm running low on paper towels so let's go to Plan B, which is just a punch in the teeth.
Really, does anyone need to be taught how to masturbate? Women might, I suppose; but I'm fairly certain dudes can figure it out pretty well on their own, as it's not a complicated process for us.
Gender roles? Please...I've been a stay-home dad for 11 years. I could lecture for days on gender roles. Bottom line: two people have kids and a house full of shit that needs to get done. Flip a coin, start picking chores, and do 'em. I'm over-simplifying here, but you get the idea. And I'll lay this one one you, curious readers, from an expert on the subject, which is me: don't think for one minute that because I stayed home and was the primary care-giver to my children that you can call me Mr. Mom and not get decked for it. I didn't sit around the house wondering what my wife would have done in any given situation: I dealt with it the way I thought best. I wasn't a father trying to be a mother; I was doing what all fathers should do: help raise their kids in the best way I could. For me, that meant staying home, because Lit majors don't make squat, while actuaries are quite adequately compensated for their time. It used to drive me nearly to insanity when some smarmy, middle-aged broad would come up to me in the grocery store and say, "Oh, your wife lets you take the kids out by yourself?" My response to that question ranged somewhere between an arched eyebrow and a scowl and "Shut up before I ram this avocado down your throat, because they're on sale for 10 cents apiece and I've got $2.00 burning a hole in my pocket this very instant," all the while preventing the little old man at the deli counter from jumping my place in line.
That, dear friends, is your lesson on gender roles for today. Moving on...
Even mentioning "9-year-olds" and "aphrodisiacs" in the same sentence sounds dangerous and creepy to me. What kind of twisted fuck-head would want a 9-year-old to learn about aphrodisiacs? I'll tell you what kind: a child-molesting fuck-head. Either that or an 80-year-old muslim-wants-a-10-year-old-wife kind of fuck-head (story here).
My concerns about homophobia and transphobia? I'm concerned about the gay/bi/trans community continually trying to force the rest of us to accept their lifestyles as normal. They aren't. Most people are straight, but like any minority that feels put upon, they use the rising wave of liberalism to act smug and self-righteous and demand to be accepted even as they mock, deride, and ridicule us "breeders". I really don't have a problem with gays; it's none of my business. Until, of course, they rant and rave and carry on in public and make it my business, then I'll speak my mind. My advice is this, Homo Joe and Lezzy Lizzy: stop throwing your sexuality in my face and I'll stop wanting to punch yours. Deal?
And the UN of all organizations talking about the abuse of power in any context? It is to laugh...
How many reasons are there for abortion? There is one: we don't want to accept responsibility for this life we've created, so we're going to get rid of it. Everything else is just a salve for a guilty conscience.
Someone please explain to me how teaching young American children about masturbation and abortion is going to help the HIV/AIDS problem in Africa, or anywhere else, for that matter?
As to the authors' "rigorous review" of sex-ed literature, that phrase just lends itself to juvenile comments, such as "What? They got all hot and sweaty trying to figure out the Kama Sutra?" or "Dr. Kirby was caught rigorously reviewing Miss March." That was a fantastically bad choice of words by Mark Richmond, an UNESCO director.
In all seriousness, I see this as another attempt to indoctrinate and control American youth in an effort to replace The Family with The State. Government doing what parents are supposed to do. And that is not good for our country. If this appalling travesty comes to your town or school, fight it with every waking moment. Let the UN and Soros and Hussein and all the other globalist/socialist ass-hats out there know that Free Americans will raise their own children.
UN story here.
A few last thoughts, with a hat tip to Ranger Steve's buddy Jim for this:
"Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea." Matthew 18:6
I'll end with this one:
"See that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you that their angels in heaven always look upon the face of my heavenly Father." Matthew 18:10
No comments:
Post a Comment