A review group supported by the science academies of the U.S., Britain, the Netherlands, and "about 100 other countries" has issued a report saying that the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, they of "the glaciers are vanishing" and "Holland is the next Atlantis" fame, should only make predictions when they have "solid evidence" and that they should also avoid "policy advocacy".
Really? People shouldn't make a lot of dumbass predictions based on incomplete computer models made without actual findings from, you know, OUTSIDE THE FREAKIN' LAB? And they shouldn't shill for whatever eco-nut douchebag kicks back the most swag, in an effort to defraud the world at large and have their pathetic claptrap made into international law?
That just sounds like crazy talk to me, but I'm willing to buy into it...
No comments:
Post a Comment